2) It ensures that when people post links here on the forums, they continue to be up-to-date at all points in the future, which is an entirely worry-free endeavor. 1) We don't have to change all of our back-end code for serving files from the online store, etc. We keep the filename the same for a few very good reasons. GoogleSketchUpProWEN.v.exe It would make it easier to distinguish the latest from all the other turkeys? It would also make more sense to rename each new GoogleSketchUpProWEN.exe by including the revision number in the title ie. Fixing the underlying architecture to actually make patch distribution an efficient endeavor would be an enormous job which would go 100% unnoticed, unfortunately. I'll also point out that if you were to perform a binary diff on all of the files in each release, you would find that the overwhelming majority of files were all changed, which is a byproduct of our product architecture. While we use a good MSI technology on Windows that makes managing installation a much easier affair, it still would be quite a bit of work to make such customizations. You can also thank the good folks at Apple for never creating a fundamentally solid install/uninstall technology, which also contributes greatly to the problem on Mac. I think the amount of work it will take to create reliable patch files and the tech support effort it would require to make sure everyone installs and manages them in the proper sequence and manner would easily dwarf any benefit that such a scheme would provide. The truth is, we're a pretty small team and every minute we spend fixing problem "A" is a minute lost to problem "B". I've seen an awful lot of complaints around the forums in general from folks who seem to think we have a team of thousands working on SketchUp and wanting to know why we haven't fixed every pet peeve bug. Creating patches is actually an extraordinary amount of work in comparison to using our existing (automated) process for creating full product installers. I recognize that it may seem inconvenient to have to download such big files every time we make an update, but in the grand scheme of things, it's not too frequent. Tomot wrote:Would it not be simpler to create a patch.exe for D/L, to fix these bugs: Instead everyone is downloading and installing yet another copy of GoogleSketchUpProWEN.exe
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |